The Downside of Digital Immortality

Last month John Wilson, editor of Books and Culture, lamented a loss of books via his Twitter account: “Went to garage to get a book from a box of African American history and lit. Mildew. Aggh. Aggggh.” Aggh is right! We book lovers know the sinking feeling that accompanies such a discovery, be it mildew, a child’s busy hands, or – all too common – the lent book that never returns.  John’s tweet, and the sympathetic condolences it elicited, got me thinking about the risks inherent to our attachment to things, especially books of the physical variety.

IMG_3837

A few of the books in our living room.

I continue to have little interest in e-readers for a bunch of reasons, including a couple I’ve written about before.  But doesn’t John’s experience with the garage mildew make a good case for digital books? As I understand it, these texts are saved in “the cloud” so that, should your reading device succumb to the elements, your books are never in danger of being lost.  The e-book is immortal, always available to its owner.  It cannot be lost.

This appears to be a great improvement over the decay and loss-prone cover and paper variety of book.  But I wonder.  Doesn’t the lament over the lost book say something about its goodness as a physical thing? Such a loss would surely be experienced differently if it took place in the digital world.  I imagine being frustrated with the technology but unconcerned about my ability to find the book.  And let’s assume for a minute that an e-book could actually be lost, dissolved into the digital ether.  I have to believe the loss would still be experienced differently than a well-loved, dog-eared copy of a favorite book that has long sat on the study shelf or even in a box in the garage.  The physical book has memory attached to itself, whether in the form of hastily appropriated bookmarks, notes scrawled in the margins, or the simple power of an object to recall forgotten thoughts, conversations, and emotions.  Assuming an e-book could actually be lost, that loss would be an inconvenience and little more.

And so I’m left to accept that some objects are valuable enough to risk their loss and the accompanying sadness. The promise of permanence made by the digital text ends up eliminating much of what many of us look to our books for.

2 comments

  1. Michael

    I, too, am cool on this development. I don’t own one. I’m biased for itchy pieces of paper. But, being generous, perhaps e-readers are for the books we don’t want on our shelves. I can’t think of a book worth reading that wouldn’t also be worth having, in a physical sense, but maybe…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s